Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1293 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 4% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 259 vs 248 FPS
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €69.02 vs €379.64
- Up to 82% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.27 vs €1.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
248
95%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
17%
Price, €
€379.64
18%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |