Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 414 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 4% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 221 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €333.68 vs €379.64
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
213
96.38009049773756%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€379.64
87%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74408 minutes ago
Buy for €333.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74408 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
69.94011976047905%
Multi-Core
5794
81.73226124982367%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |