Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 600 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 185 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €311.39 vs €379.64
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
182
98.37837837837839%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€379.64
82%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74488 minutes ago
Buy for €311.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74488 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
75.40348612007747%
Multi-Core
5794
92.6150895140665%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |