Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €379.64 vs €442.65
- Up to 11% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-10900 - €3.14 vs €3.54 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
121
96%
Value, €/FPS
€3.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17868 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.54/FPS
88%
Price, €
€442.65
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for €442.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17868 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |