Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 495 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €379.64 vs €455.01
- Up to 11% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-9900KF - €2.42 vs €2.72 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 167 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
157
94%
Value, €/FPS
€2.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.72/FPS
88%
Price, €
€455.01
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for €455.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |