Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-8700T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-8700T is 214 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 32% better in Cities: Skylines II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 25 vs 19 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €308.12 vs €379.64
- Up to 38% better value when playing Cities: Skylines II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €12.32 vs €19.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
19
76%
Value, €/FPS
€19.98/FPS
61%
Price, €
€379.64
81%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
25
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€308.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €308.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |