Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-8700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1079 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-8700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-8700T - 163 vs 160 FPS
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - €76.36 vs €435.67
- Up to 83% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-8700T - €0.47 vs €2.72 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €76.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
Buy for €435.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |