Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 4207 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i7-860 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-860 - €80.5 vs €321.81
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €80.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 429 minutes ago
Buy for €321.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
30.674002751031637%
Multi-Core
1463
32.71466905187835%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |