Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €69.02 vs €349.57
- Up to 80% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i9-10900KF - €0.34 vs €1.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i3-10105F - 208 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
20%
Price, €
€349.57
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €349.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |