Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €69.02 vs €376.86
- Up to 78% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-13700F - €0.17 vs €0.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-10105F - 476 vs 417 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
417
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
476
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
21%
Price, €
€376.86
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |