Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 669 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - €69.02 vs €372.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 7900 - €0.57 vs €2.72 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-10105F - 137 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Buy for €372 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |