Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - €73.0 vs €269.87
- Up to 69% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-12700F - €0.55 vs €1.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10105F - 150 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2558 minutes ago
Buy for €269.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2559 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |