Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1542 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-9370 - 133 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than FX-9370 - £163.75 vs £169.97
- Up to 8% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-9370 - £1.23 vs £1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 180 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 16 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £169.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15927 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15928 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |