Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3068 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - £169.97 vs £202.05
- Up to 2% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-12600K - £0.62 vs £0.63 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 17% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-9370 - 321 vs 275 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £169.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19057 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
321
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.63/FPS
98%
Price, £
£202.05
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for £202.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19057 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |