Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600K outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1956 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 20% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-9370 - 216 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than FX-9370 - £168.88 vs £169.97
- Up to 17% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-9370 - £0.78 vs £0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £169.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15278 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
216
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.78/FPS
100%
Price, £
£168.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |