Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2835 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 25% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-9370 - 145 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than FX-9370 - £155.5 vs £169.97
- Up to 27% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-9370 - £1.07 vs £1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 65 vs 220 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £169.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13627 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£155.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £155.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13628 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |