Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $560.32 vs $765.76
- Up to 21% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i5-13400F - $1.83 vs $2.33 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 328 vs 307 FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
307
94%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€560.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7239 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
328
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.33/FPS
79%
Price, €
€765.76
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7238 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |