Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 426 days older than the more expensive Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-13400F - 166 vs 165 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $251.35 vs $765.76
- Up to 67% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-13400F - $1.51 vs $4.64 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6260 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €251.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6261 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |