Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1002 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - €20.16 vs €133.41
- Up to 84% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i7-6700T - €0.11 vs €0.68 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 5% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron G1620 - 197 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
187
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Buy for €133.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |