Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 2787 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1620 - 422 vs 368 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - €20.16 vs €121.54
- Up to 83% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - €0.05 vs €0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
422
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
17%
Price, €
€121.54
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
368
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Renoir | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |