Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 406 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - €20.16 vs €91.04
- Up to 77% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-2700K - €0.16 vs €0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1620 - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
127
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Buy for €91.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |