Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 514 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - €20.16 vs €78.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-4150 - €0.17 vs €0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G1620 - 120 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
116
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |