Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1500X is 588 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
- Performs up to 6% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G3900 - 202 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1500X - €51.75 vs €79.97
- Up to 32% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 5 1500X - €0.27 vs €0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1500X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €79.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |