Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 895 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - €51.08 vs €73.45
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3900 - 179 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €51.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74450 minutes ago
Buy for €73.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74451 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
58.27482447342026%
Multi-Core
992
34.70958712386284%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |