Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - €53.15 vs €110.49
- Up to 46% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-10100 - €0.25 vs €0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3900 - 239 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13250 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
54%
Price, €
€110.49
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €110.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |