Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G5400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G5400 is 944 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 56% cheaper than Pentium Gold G5400 - €53.15 vs €122.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dead Space than Pentium Gold G5400 - €0.37 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 51 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3900 - 146 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14105 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
44%
Price, €
€122
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €122 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |