Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 895 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - €51.08 vs €74.94
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3900 - 117 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €51.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74494 minutes ago
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74495 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
54.966887417218544%
Multi-Core
992
30.115361262902248%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |