Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 1484 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3500X - €51.75 vs €119.98
- Up to 51% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Ryzen 5 3500X - €0.26 vs €0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 14% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G3900 - 225 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
198
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
49%
Price, €
€119.98
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €119.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |