Buy on Amazon
€51.08
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €51.08 vs €70.56
- Up to 20% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-10105F - €0.16 vs €0.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 9% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3900 - 350 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
322
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.08
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56326 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-10105F 10. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 4 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070110105F
Buy for €70.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
39.95873452544704%
Multi-Core
992
22.182468694096602%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
