Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1541 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 23% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €53.15 vs €69.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Athlon 3000G - €0.12 vs €0.14 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 10% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G3900 - 503 vs 459 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
459
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13410 minutes ago
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13411 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |