Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600K is 61 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 51 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - 175 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €45.0 vs €53.15
- Up to 26% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - €0.26 vs €0.35 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14002 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14002 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |