Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 578 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G1820 - 182 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-6600K - €35.49 vs €45.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-6600K - €0.2 vs €0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 53 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18525 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
178
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18524 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |