Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1334 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1820 - 266 vs 253 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - €34.94 vs €35.49
- Up to 7% better value when playing F1 22 than Celeron G1820 - €0.13 vs €0.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
266
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €34.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |