Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1552 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Phenom II X4 830 - 195 vs 193 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 22% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - €27.62 vs €35.49
- Up to 22% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Celeron G1820 - €0.14 vs €0.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
193
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Haswell | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |