Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-4300 is 1148 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 5% cheaper than FX-4300 - €27.62 vs €29.22
- Up to 4% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-4300 - €0.24 vs €0.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom II X4 830 - 115 vs 113 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
113
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17326 minutes ago
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | FX |
Deneb | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |