Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600K is 61 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron G3900 - 209 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €45.0 vs €53.15
- Up to 21% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Celeron G3900 - €0.22 vs €0.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 51 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12796 minutes ago
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12795 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |