Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 695 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 6% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G3900 - 253 vs 239 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €34.94 vs €51.75
- Up to 36% better value when playing Ready or Not than Celeron G3900 - €0.14 vs €0.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €34.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |