Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 404 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G1820 - 178 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |