Buy on Amazon
€69
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2823 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 9% better in Lost Ark than FX-6200 - 241 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 38% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €42.6 vs €69.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Lost Ark than Athlon 3000G - €0.19 vs €0.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17097 minutes ago
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6200 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17096 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Athlon | Collection | FX |
| Picasso | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
