Buy on Amazon
€42.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1282 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 18% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €42.6 vs €51.75
- Up to 14% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3900 - €0.48 vs €0.56 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6200 - 92 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6200 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
