Buy on Amazon
€42.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2500K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2500K is 414 days older than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - €42.6 vs €43.94
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 18% better in FIFA 23 than FX-6200 - 107 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 13% better value when playing FIFA 23 than FX-6200 - €0.41 vs €0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6200 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.94
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2500K CPU Verwendeter 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,3 GHz 6M 95W LGA1155
Buy for €43.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
