Buy on Amazon
€42.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-860 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-860 is 902 days older than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i7-860 - €42.6 vs €45.78
- Up to 8% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i7-860 - €0.23 vs €0.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-6200 - 183 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6200 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
CHYYAC Intel Core I7-860 I7 860 2,8 GHz Quad-Core Acht-Thread-CPU-Prozessor 8M 95W LGA 1156
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Lynnfield |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
