Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2184 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 14% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €45.78 vs €53.15
- Up to 10% better value when playing Starfield than Celeron G3900 - €1.04 vs €1.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Core i7-860 - 46 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4117 minutes ago
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |