Buy on Amazon
€51.75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2500K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2500K is 1696 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3900 - 257 vs 256 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €43.94 vs €51.75
- Up to 15% better value when playing F1 22 than Celeron G3900 - €0.17 vs €0.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
257
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2500K CPU Verwendeter 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,3 GHz 6M 95W LGA1155
Buy for €43.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
