Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1830 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - €42.6 vs €290.43
- Up to 84% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 7 1700 - €0.29 vs €1.87 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6200 - 155 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |