Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3599 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - €42.6 vs €239.41
- Up to 78% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-12500 - €0.06 vs €0.27 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 31% better in Valorant than FX-6200 - 888 vs 680 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Buy for €239.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |