Buy on Amazon
€53.15
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3470S is 1187 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-3470S - €53.15 vs €64.13
- Up to 16% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i5-3470S - €0.49 vs €0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Performs up to 1% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G3900 - 110 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
109
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.15
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13412 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-3470S Prozessor (2,9GHz, Sockel 1155, 6MB Cache, 65 Watt)
Buy for €64.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13412 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470S |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
