Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2317 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G3900 - 245 vs 231 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
231
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15661 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |