Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1500X is 357 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
- Performs up to 26% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G4900 - 323 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1500X - €60.24 vs €79.97
- Up to 8% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 1500X - €0.23 vs €0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1500X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €79.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
257
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |