Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1006 days older than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 54 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 138% better in League of Legends than Celeron G4900 - 164 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - €53.0 vs €60.24
- Up to 63% better value when playing League of Legends than Celeron G4900 - €0.32 vs €0.87 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |